I went to the Blah last night and it was great to see faces old and new and chat about all things emergent. I’m fairly convinced that I was the youngest person there, which was funny. Strange that a movement (???) which demonstrates so many of the values of youth culture has so few young leaders, strange and kind of sad. If it was a led by Matt Redman and not tallskinnykiwi the place would have packed with youthful faces and I would have felt strangely old so why are they missing from the emerging church? Perhaps it’s because it’s a new thing and emergent leaders haven’t emerged enough to mentor the next generation…
Tallskinnykiwi had lots to say, particularly about the new media, I took shed loads of notes on my fancy Pocket PC, but that has died so I’m afraid you’re going to have to wait a little while for more details. It was particularly good to see Ben, Helen and Pete, I’m sure they’ll have lots to say in the next twenty-four hours.
I also got to chat to Phil Meadows, one of the newer tutors at Cliff. He really opened my eyes to some of the flaws of the whole emergent thing…expect some questions that I need answers for fairly soon- more interactive blogging, I tell you it’s the future!
Great to see you there Phil, hopefully we'll be able to catch up more at Greenbelt too.
Posted by: Ben | July 27, 2005 at 10:40 AM
Hey Phil,
My only comment would be that I don't think Blah is necessarily aimed at emerging churchers or their leaders - it's just a forum to challenge and enlighten those who want to engage in the theory and theology of that scene. And - I'm not THAT old! ;-)
Laura
Posted by: Laura | July 27, 2005 at 05:10 PM
I think people in the "emerging church" (gah! I hate labels!) are old fogies, compared to your youthful self Phil, because it does often consist of people who are either un-churched or people who have grown cynical or have tried "established" church structures for years and then felt God calling them to do something on different lines.
You're right about the emerging church not having had a chance yet to bring young people through its ranks.
It has to be said that a number of the even-OLDER people that were there I recognised from evangelical churches and not from emerging churches.
You need not have anyone "open your eyes" to the emerging church's flaws. I think anyone who is involved in the movement can clearly see we have a long way to go, and anyone who espouses a belief that emerging church is the answer to everything should be smothered in a large pinch of salt.
Good to see you on Tuesday.
Eyan (Sanctus1)
www.fatroland.com
Posted by: Eyan | July 27, 2005 at 06:40 PM
I realised in my above comment I careless used the phrase "evangelical churches and not emerging churches", thereby falling into the trap of using labels that I so hate. Scrap "evangelical" and read "established big non-emerging sensible church"... or something...
Posted by: Eyan | July 27, 2005 at 06:44 PM
Just to throw in a comment on older people! I think its more encouraging to see 'older' people take up the emerging church movement, simply because we moan that old people dont like change and refuse to accept young or alternative styles of worship!
I believe through this acceptance by the oldies will soon attract young people and give more respect to the older leaders, which can seem to lack today!
The only problem that could arise is the traditional emerging church!!!! Keep your eyes open.
Posted by: Paul Saxton | July 28, 2005 at 11:04 AM
Bookmarked this page,thanks god someone that actually knows what they are talking about
Posted by: seo services | November 03, 2011 at 09:22 PM