So I appreciate that this is a little late, but here are my
thoughts about Brian McLaren’s seminar last week.
The first thing that struck me about Brian was his gentle
approach. Although he made no reference to this fact it is well known that
Brian receives what is best described as hate male and a significant part of
the Christian right in America seriously doubt Brian’s position in the book of
life. Nevertheless Brian is always gracious about his critics and throughout
the session didn’t have a bad word to say about anyone. I particularly liked
his reasoning behind this; I the second session Brian focused on
TallSkinnyKiwi’s ‘Deep Ecclesiology’. I didn’t fully understand what he had to
say, but the gist was that whether we’re Anglo-Catholic or house church, we’re
all church and therefore we must learn to encourage (rather than criticise) one
another. This is especially important, argued McLaren, in terms of justice,
because there is so much to be done (i.e. with a child dying every three
seconds we need everybody doing social action irrespective of our theological
differences).
Building on this I questioned Mr McLaren himself on current
disagreements in the church McLaren’s response was that we should not attack
other churches. Rather we (whoever we are) should do what we feel is right and
see what happens. Rather pragmatic, but quite refreshing me thinks…
Another interesting point came in the midst of the first
session while McLaren was exploring the transition through modernity to
postmodernity (which he called emergent culture) and beyond. McLaren likened
this transition to the discoveries of Copernicus and Galileo. At that time the
theology of the church was based on a certain model of the universe (the earth
was at its centre) and so there was great concern at the findings of Copernicus
and Galileo because the presumption was that when the old worldview went, the
church would go with it. Similarly today the church has become so reliant upon
modernist thinking that any move from that ideology is, for the church, seen as
worrying; as society rejects reason, perhaps it will reject religion as well?
Probably not suggests McLaren, and so the church must adapt and carefully
consider this new thinking.
However, and this is where it gets really interesting, McLaren
did not suggest that everyone should read his books and other similar pieces of
work, but rather those that are sitting pretty in their current way of thinking
and not doing anyone any harm should just be left to their own devices, in fact
they should be discouraged from reading such work (one of McLaren’s friend,
whom he studied with, having studied postmodern philosophy in the seventies
decided it was incompatible with his faith). On the one hand I see what McLaren
is saying, on the other I think such writings are important so that those in
the church can understand a little more about those of us that are (at best) on
the fringes.
It was a bit of a detour on my way to a meeting at Cliff College. But I'm glad I went. And thanks ot the guys out there from Glasgow who invited me to their table when they saw me eating alone prior to the event :-)
Recent Comments